Page 48 - Slide 1

The Road Ahead
The debate over secularism’s place in India’s future is far from settled. While proponents of
current policies argue they are reclaiming cultural heritage and addressing historical
wrongs, critics warn of long-term damage to India’s unity. For secularism to survive, an
inclusive dialogue acknowledging diverse perspectives is essential.
India’s journey reflects a dynamic tension between tradition, modernity, and constitutional
ideals. Whether secularism endures or transforms will shape the country’s democratic and
cultural identity.
“Secularism is not about living in harmony with one’s religion; it is about living in harmony
with all religions.”

Amrit Singh
BBA Sem 3

Understanding the Uniform Civil Code: A Path to Equality or
Controversy?

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has long been a subject of debate in India, representing one
of the most contentious and polarizing issues in the nation’s socio-political landscape.
Envisioned as a framework to replace personal laws based on religion with a unified set of
civil laws applicable to all citizens, the UCC is enshrined in Article 44 of the Indian
Constitution as a directive principle of state policy. However, its implementation remains a
point of contention, raising questions about equality, secularism, and cultural identity.
What is the Uniform Civil Code?
The UCC aims to unify personal laws governing marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption,
and maintenance across all religions. Currently, personal laws in India are largely derived
from religious traditions—Hindu, Muslim, Christian, and others—resulting in differing legal
frameworks for citizens depending on their faith. For example, Hindu law permits adoption,
while Muslim law has no formal adoption process, and Christian laws have distinct
inheritance provisions.
The proponents of the UCC argue that a common civil code will promote equality and
justice by ensuring uniformity in personal laws. Critics, however, fear that such a move
might dilute India's cultural and religious diversity and infringe upon fundamental rights to
freedom of religion.